Your comments
Thank you feedback! We will dicuss this and see if we can implement this going forward.
Thank you for your Feedback, we will discuss this internally.
Hi,
Thank you for your feedback!
So you want to navigate to a specif commit by commit id and not filter the list of commits?
Cheers
Daniel
We should distinguish between PR with source in the same repo or from a different fork:
* In the same repo: it would be best if one could easily check out the source branch, where testing, work, and pushing can be done.
* From a different fork: here, one can only check out one specific commit. This results in a detached HEAD, which many may be hard for a lot of people. I would not offer this in the UI at first, but it is okay in the log.
What would be the best preconditions to enable this?
I would only provide it on the PR objects, not where it shows in the screenshot (the local branch may not even exist).
Ideally, it would be the existing "Check Out" label. This currently does not work on PR objects (currently disabled). This also ensures that Accelerators work properly.
Pawel,
thank you for your feedback! There is some complexity to this. To open a file or to open a full solution?
In what part of the process do you want to us it? During Merge/Rebase? or from changes in the diff view?
Cheers
Daniel
Hi
Thank you for sharing your feedback with us!
I seem to understand what you ask for, but I have some questions:
* which Version of SmartGit are you using
* which UI are using Standard/Log graph/Working tree (you can see the choice in /Edit/Preferences/User Interface
Cheers
Daniel
Understood!
What is the scope for the coloring - just you - or all SmartGit Users in your organization that work with this Repo?
It's been a while - but we are looking into this!
Should this be rule based? e.g name patterns like "release/" or status based like CI fails - or just a manual coloring?
Customer support service by UserEcho
I see the solutions with public cloud services very problematic for none open source projects.
How would it be able to comply with ISO27001 with such a setup?
https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/iso27001