The current Git convention is changing the principal branch name from master to main but SmartGit always create the principal branch named "master". If user want to use a different name to the principal branch a rename action is required after repository is created.

Please, add a configuration option to permit user configure any preferred name for the principal branch, then when a new repository is created, the preferred name is used, instead master.

Thanks for your attention and support,

When I create a local branch which doesn't track any remote branch yet and want to push the changes to a remote it would be nice if there was an option to select the remote repository and the branch.

Basically I would like to see this dialog, which is shown when I select "Push Up To..." in the branches view:

also when I select "Push Up To..." in the logs view.

The behavior of "Push Up To..." differs between the different windows:

Working Tree Window + Log Window: A dialog is shown where I can push the commits and SmartGit will push the changes to a corresponding branch on the default remote

Standard Window: SmartGit directly pushes to a corresponding branch on the default remote

I often work with local commits where I have stored some local settings which I don't won't to push to the remote repository. That's the reason why I sometimes don't won't to push the complete branch to the remote repository.

Best regards

Martin

Please add the ability to take all blocks above/below the current position in the File Compare interface

On Github Enterprise it is possible to register an app. In the dialog you have to specify a callback URL. If I understood it correctly this registration would be needed if I wanted to generate an access token from within SmartGit. If this is the case it would be nice if there was some documentation on how to configure this.

It would be helpful to have an option that allows to reduce the complexity of the log graph by showing only commits that are tagged, or somewhat decorated (like head of branhces, etc.), still keeping branch and merge points visible.

In essence, the result should be what you get on the command line with:

git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline

That would make it much easier to grasp the history of repos that have long lived branches with hundreds of commits, which are seldom merged and tagged.

On the UI, this option could be a button/menu next to the filter text box, or could be triggered by a special "keyword" typed directly there, like "tagged" or "decorated" (with some special character perhaps? like #tagged or #decorated)

When I start typing and selection start jumping in the branches tree I would go one step further and actually filter the branches tree.. that way I can be better guided into finding what I'm looking for. 

Who ever worked with Jetbrains Rider or other IDE they know what I mean. Virtually EVERY list () can be quick-filtered on the spot which is very powerful. 

We copy full Commit / File name (with details) by Ctrl+C, and short Commit name by Ctrl+Shift+C.

Please realize copying short file name (i.e. filename only) by Ctrl+Shift+C.

Please support working with Git-providers based on https://gogs.io/

Currently, the "Branches" pane shows a count of the number of branches in each top-level group (e.g. "Local Branches (3)" or "origin (27)"). And when "Group tags and branches by path-like name" is selected, there's a sub-group for each initial path component, with all branches having the same path component underneath that group.

Problem: we use path grouping for different developers, and some developers have gotten out of control on how many of their branches are still hanging around. But, it's hard to see which developer has lots of branches and which has few.

Suggestion: have the sub-groups display the count of branches within that sub-group.

Hi

while the font size of the SG application is configurable with the defaultSize ui low level props, the font size of the Merge request comments is apparently fixed and very small (the comments are almost unreadable). Is there a way to increase this font? If not, it should be possible to do it, please!

Thanks in advance