Share your ideas on how to improve SmartGit!
This is no support platform! To report bugs or request support, please contact us directly. If in doubt ask us.
First search for a similar request and add your votes or comments there.
Take the time to describe your request as precise as possible, so we (Syntevo) and other users will understand what you want. A plain request "SmartGit should look cool" is too vague because we don't know what we should change, and hence will not be approved by us.
Thank you for your help!
In some of our repositories we have commits from developers with different Name, but with same email address (short name, full name).
git already supports user name mapping by using a "mailmap" file, so only one name will be display in e.g. the git short log. SmartGit should support this, too.
Please add support for Visual Basic (both "classic" and .NET) in the list of languages recognised by the syntax highlighter. Currently the "Basic" language only supports the original version with uppercase keywords.
When reading the log of some public repository like Ansible in this example, all pull requests appear without specific link, just the number & title, so we have to make a search to discover some details about each PR.
In the Journal, it would be nice to be able to show the remote and local commits for an auxiliary branch at the same time. For example develop and origin/develop. This would be really helpful when working on a feature branch.
When the context menu from the "Remotes" list is invoked and "Push to.." is selected, it would be nice if the remote on which the context menu has been opened would be preselected.
I found myself more than once almost pushing to the wrong remote.
Alternatively, there should be an entry in the context menu named "push to this remote".
After all that's why it is called a context menu, because it should respect the context. Other context menus of SmartGit use that logic.
I find that sometimes if I close a view in the SmartGit workspace I forget how to get it back. Also, I imagine that different users have different tastes in what consitutes and efficient SmartGit workspace. It would be nice if the current layouts and dimensions of views could be saved as a named workspace that could be called up later.
Essentially, the Main and Review "Perspectives" are pre-defined workspaces. All I am suggesting is to allow users to name and use other arrangements of workspace views.
Customer support service by UserEcho