Share your ideas on how to improve SmartGit!


This is no support platform! To report bugs or request support, please contact us directly. If in doubt ask us.


First search for a similar request and add your votes or comments there.


Take the time to describe your request as precisely as possible, so users will understand what you want. Please note that we appreciate your time and input, but we don't give any guarantees that a certain feature will be implemented. Usually, a minimum requirement is a sufficient number of votes. Hence, please don't comment like "when will this be implemented", but vote instead.

Follow the stackoverflow.com writing guidelines.

Thank you for your help!

0

GitHub Enterprise: support SmartGit as OAuth app

Martin Stolpe 6 months ago updated by Marc Strapetz 6 months ago 1

On Github Enterprise it is possible to register an app. In the dialog you have to specify a callback URL. If I understood it correctly this registration would be needed if I wanted to generate an access token from within SmartGit. If this is the case it would be nice if there was some documentation on how to configure this.

0

Use filter to show only tagged commits

yfede 6 months ago updated by Thomas Singer 6 months ago 1

It would be helpful to have an option that allows to reduce the complexity of the log graph by showing only commits that are tagged, or somewhat decorated (like head of branhces, etc.), still keeping branch and merge points visible.


In essence, the result should be what you get on the command line with:

git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline

That would make it much easier to grasp the history of repos that have long lived branches with hundreds of commits, which are seldom merged and tagged.

On the UI, this option could be a button/menu next to the filter text box, or could be triggered by a special "keyword" typed directly there, like "tagged" or "decorated" (with some special character perhaps? like #tagged or #decorated)

Graph
0

Actually filter when typing

Vojta Machacek 6 months ago 0

When I start typing and selection start jumping in the branches tree I would go one step further and actually filter the branches tree.. that way I can be better guided into finding what I'm looking for. 


Who ever worked with Jetbrains Rider or other IDE they know what I mean. Virtually EVERY list () can be quick-filtered on the spot which is very powerful. 

Image 862

0

Ability to "star" a branch

Vojta Machacek 6 months ago updated 6 months ago 1

Ability to visualy separate branch(es) in the branches tree. Like favorite or star whatever you want to call it. I want to have a short list where its easy to pick from

0

Allow "Move to" context menu to be hierarchical to match Repositories groups

Chris Jaquet 6 months ago updated by Daniel Siegl 6 months ago 1

We use nested groups to great effect in the Repositories view to manage our all our projects, often consisting of 100+ repos each. To arrange the repos in these groups we can either drag and drop into the group or use the context menu and choose "Move To".

With a hundred repos in a group dragging repos to another group does not work (in the past it would scroll slowly if you moved to the top/bottom of the view but this no longer appears to work) so we now use the context menu. The issue with the context menu is that it is a flat representation of all the groups. There are up/down arrows at the top of the context sub-menu but these only adjust the menu one line at a time which is also very slow.

My feature request is to make the "Move to" menu follow the same hierarchy as the groups in the Repositories view, using sub-menus rather than just spaces. This could be an optional feature enabled in config to not break other customers' workflows.

Some stats about my setup:

Number of repos managed by SmartGit: ~2800

Number of groups defined: ~210 (42 level 1, 146 level 2, 22 level 3)

SmartGit Details

Version: 23.1.3 #20195

Java version: 17.0.5+8-LTS (c:\program files\smartgit\jre)

Windows version: Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19045.4412]

GUI Repository Management
0
Completed

Copy file name by Ctrl+Shift+C

arcadius 6 months ago updated by Thomas Singer 6 months ago 3

We copy full Commit / File name (with details) by Ctrl+C, and short Commit name by Ctrl+Shift+C.

Please realize copying short file name (i.e. filename only) by Ctrl+Shift+C.

0

Support hosting providers based on Gogs

arcadius 6 months ago 0

Please support working with Git-providers based on https://gogs.io/

Hosting provider
0

Have line spacing options (e.g. 100% 125%, 150%) for code/text, graph, repository, etc. views

Martin Weber 6 months ago 0

Currently, all the views are tighty packed with text and hard to read. A bit more line spacing might go a long way of making information more readable. Using a slightly smaller font with that still allows for the same amount of information to be on screen.

GUI
0

In Branches pane, show count of branches in each subpath

griscom 7 months ago 0

Currently, the "Branches" pane shows a count of the number of branches in each top-level group (e.g. "Local Branches (3)" or "origin (27)"). And when "Group tags and branches by path-like name" is selected, there's a sub-group for each initial path component, with all branches having the same path component underneath that group.

Problem: we use path grouping for different developers, and some developers have gotten out of control on how many of their branches are still hanging around. But, it's hard to see which developer has lots of branches and which has few.

Suggestion: have the sub-groups display the count of branches within that sub-group.

Branches view
0

Font size of the Gitlab Merge requests comments

Davide F 7 months ago 0

Hi

while the font size of the SG application is configurable with the defaultSize ui low level props, the font size of the Merge request comments is apparently fixed and very small (the comments are almost unreadable). Is there a way to increase this font? If not, it should be possible to do it, please!

Thanks in advance